Is Your OQ Program Effective?

Energy Worldnet (EWN) • May 21, 2019

Share this article

EWN Compliance News | vol. 4

Do you check your OQ training at least annually to review employee pass-fail rates and assess which evaluation questions are missed? If not, you are treating evaluations as if they are nothing more than pass-fail documents. Without submitting failed evaluations, you cannot rely on your data. Without correcting problems associated with the relationship between your evaluations and your OQ training, you end up training people to pass the evaluation and then have to actually teach them how to do the job later. This can cost you time, money, and can even lead to a dangerous situation between the time employees pass an ineffective evaluation and the time when they are eventually trained properly.

You Should be Evaluating Your Evaluations

Your evaluations are a way to ensure your training is relevant and effective. Performance of the task is, without a doubt, the best evaluation method. If something is missed here, you need to know it. Even the submission of failed performance evaluation can be a key indicator of knowledge transfer problems. PHMSA has implied that performance of the task should be a part of the evaluation process. If your evaluations do not match your process, then it's time to change them.

EWN encourages clients to take ownership of their OQ program and make them their own. EWN works continuously to update and create content that aligns with the most widely-accepted Industry Standards and Practices. We currently have over 400 OQ computer-based trainings, so chances are we have something that is applicable to your unique tasks. Updating your current methods can be an effective way to improve your qualification process.

Trying to Make an 'Off-the-Shelf' Program Work

Governmental entities and associations across the nation are stepping up and speaking out with a clear message: Off-the-shelf, cookie-cutter programs are not effective. When an Operator's AOCs (abnormal operating conditions) are not addressed in their training and evaluations, it can lead to problems, and these governmental entities and associations are taking notice. In a recent report, one state agency proclaimed, "Allowing Operators to be 'qualified' without a hands-on experience and a proper evaluation of AOCs fails to ensure the safety of the gas system."

If your OQ Plan doesn't address your AOCs – or if you need to create supplemental training that addresses your specific needs, you need to create custom content. The EWN Content Authoring Tool can help you create critical questions that address your AOCs. If these questions are missed, the system can initiate an automatic fail. Adding these critical, operator-specific questions can be used to ensure that the question has been read and understood, leading to increased peace of mind that the employee has been trained appropriately.

Task List and Performed Tasks Inconsistencies

Is your task list consistent with what is being performed on your pipeline and at your facilities? Too often we see tasks not being performed but still included in the Operators task list and OQ Plan. If it's not in your O&M, not performed on your pipeline, or if it does not meet the four-part test, it's not a covered task and should not be included in your OQ task list.

EWN suggests that Operators review their task list annually to ensure any adjustments be made to keep their task list current. EWN gives you the ability to create non-covered tasks the same as a covered tasks, ensuring consistency in your training program. These tasks remain separate from your OQ Program. Industry standardized task lists are great tools and make things simple, but take time to customize based on special requirements. If you are struggling with your task list, let EWN help you to create or update a task list that is specific to your company's OQ requirements.

About the Author

by Claude McKee, EWN Compliance Management Specialist

Claude McKee serves as a Compliance Management Specialist at EWN. His vast experience in the industry, including welding, fabrication, oil and gas production, DOT, and hands-on experience as a pipeline worker.

For more information, contact the EWN Compliance team at compliance@energyworldnet.com.

Recent Posts

By Kevin Speicher July 24, 2026
PHMSA just issued ADB-2026-06, an advisory bulletin reminding gas distribution operators of their existing obligations under 49 CFR Part 192, subpart P.
By Kevin Speicher July 22, 2026
On July 30, 2026 PHMSA is bringing the Gas Pipeline Advisory Committee & the Liquid Pipeline Advisory Committee together for a virtual meeting.
By Energy Worldnet (EWN) July 10, 2026
EWN's Regulatory Advisory Group breaks down RP 1173, PHMSA's new leadership, ECA rulemaking, multi-state OQ compliance, and PSMS for small operators.
By Kevin Speicher June 24, 2026
PHMSA's new approach of issuing 40+ targeted rulemakings instead of mega rules, and what the substantive changes mean for pipeline operators.
By Kevin Speicher June 24, 2026
PHMSA's Technical Pipeline Safety Standards Committee (GPAC) met on May 28, 2026, to work through the Safety of Gas Distribution Pipelines rule. Here's what happened and what operators need to know.
By Kevin Speicher June 19, 2026
Span of control refers to the practice of allowing an unqualified worker to perform a covered task while being directed and observed by a qualified person.
By Energy Worldnet (EWN) May 27, 2026
Former PHMSA leaders discuss PSMS, OQ, safety culture, contractor oversight, and the future of pipeline safety and compliance.
By Kevin Speicher April 30, 2026
PHMSA reinforcing sharper operational expectations: excavation damage remains one of the leading threats to pipeline safety.
Compliance Leadership Forum title slide on a dark blue screen with yellow and white text.
By Ashley Jesko February 26, 2026
Energy Worldnet (EWN) hosted the first-ever Compliance Leadership Forum (CLF)—a peer-to-peer space designed for candid, practical conversations about pipeline compliance and safety. Hosted by James Cross (Chief Experience Officer, EWN), the session brought together more than 150 years of combined experience from former state and federal regulators and industry leaders. Meet the panel Kevin Speicher, Senior Regulatory Advisor, EWN; former Chief of Pipeline Safety, New York State Department of Public Service Steve Allen, former Director of Pipeline Safety, State of Indiana; longtime PSMS advocate and former EWN executive Alan Mayberry, former PHMSA Associate Administrator, now with Jana and serving on boards focused on advanced risk and geohazards Jeff Wiese, former PHMSA Associate Administrator; former offshore operations leader; longtime safety management advocate The tone was clear from the start: no judgment, anonymous questions, and a focus on what operators can actually do next.
EWN PHMSA Update graphic with “Read More” on a dark teal background
By Kevin Speicher February 19, 2026
PHMSA has issued Advisory Bulletin ADB-2026-04, reminding gas pipeline, underground natural gas storage (UNGS), and LNG operators that incidents must be reported to the National Response Center (NRC) at the earliest practicable moment — and no later than one hour after confirmed discovery.
Show More